Mostrando postagens com marcador democracia. Mostrar todas as postagens
Mostrando postagens com marcador democracia. Mostrar todas as postagens

sábado, 9 de janeiro de 2021

Thou shalt not Kill Democracy

 

Let’s not mince words: Wednesday’s storming of the United States Capitol building was the work of fascism. That it didn’t and couldn’t succeed, and that Donald Trump is days from being out of the White House, should not blind us to the reality of larger social forces at work.

The Orange Menace possibly finished off his personal political prospects with his pathetic attempt at a putsch — although I suspect the shameless toadying of Republicans seeking to capture his base for future elections will continue — I think Trump’s base isn’t going anywhere. Neither are Trump’s fans among the police.

Suddenly, the United States became one of the Banana Republics its "elite" despises so much. It could be laughable, if it weren't so terryfing. Mai dire mai, as the saying goes…

This brazen attempt at a coup confirms what has always been evident but which some refrained from affirming. Trump is not simply an exponent of a ‘new fascism’ with Bolsonaro and others. He is Fascist pure and simple. A person who supposedly denounces fake news, he and his cronies are past masters at creating it. Sling mud as some of it will stick and give you the pretext to flout any semblance of democratic practice.

You can then use thuggery and whip your lumpen supporters and worshippers into a frenzy and have them engage in a frontal attack on Capitol Hill. The one thing that was lacking was the wearing of black shirts as I suppose this colour is detested by the white supremacists in their ranks. This stage managed attack, reminiscent of the Fascist march on Rome in 1922, assumes the state in the US is gelatinous. Thankfully it is not. Despite its historical reliance on brutal force at home and definitely abroad – Latin America and the Monroe Doctrine - there is still some vestige of democratic posturing and procedure on the home front. I would like to think a successful ‘war of manouvre’ (frontal attack on the state) is still a trifle wishful thinking in that place, though I am not that sure.

However, there were clear signs that Fascism is alive and well in the USA and Trump embraces it. He sees himself as a (pathetic) version of Caesar, who can flout all forms of democratic semblance to assume the single personification of the State, often referred to as Caesarism or Bonapartism. He might then take a leaf out of the history books to demand a plebiscite to secure that. Now this is no real surprise as he is the culmination of years of authoritarian practices spawned globally by the state he represented. This is a state that rides roughshod over democratic aspirations of people abroad and home, a state which engineers coups, direct, through Operation Condor (Chile, Argentina, Brasil) and pseudo legalistic ones (see the White coup against Dilma Roussef in Brasil) and which spawns massive inequalities at home.

Ask Blacks, Latinas/os and Indigenous if the process is democratic for them..or the early immigrants from Spain and Italy shot at by forces hired by the bosses invoking the anarchist bogey. Now it takes one person to exacerbate these tendencies. In my view if the USA is serious about its democratic credentials, he should be impeached and arrested for sedition. I suspect however that Trump continues to excite and arouse so much ‘White Supremacist’ tendencies with his speeches and actions against non-whites that he is not one to be suppressed easily. Who is to say this attempted coup was not abetted by some whose duty it is to prevent it? Am I playing dumb in posing this question? Imagine if this were a BLM attack against the racist state. They have a million more reasons to attack a system that has suppressed Black lives in the US for years. All hell would have broken loose and the area around Capitol Hill would be strewn with corpses as if we were watching the end of a Shakespeare tragedy.

Had this been Renaissance Florence there would have been calls to have Trump hanged in one of his towers as with Jacopo dei Pazzi by the Palleschi inside his family chapel at Santa Croce, following the failed coup against the Medici. Luckily we have come a long way since then and I would not wish this on anyone. But impeachment and charges of sedition are not out of order. As singer and activist Graham Nash, of CSN/CSNY fame, once said, well before Trump was elected President, this is a dangerous man. He is more than that. Beside being a swaggering and ranting bully, he remains a Fascist threat to any semblance of democracy. A sinister straw in the wind.

Under Trump’s aegis in the U.S. and Bolsonaro’s in Brasil, the rot, until then deeply entrenched, has taken over, and there is no turning back.

In both American countries, the genie is out of the bottle now; unfortunately, Bolsonaro’s or Trump’s most ardent supporters are not about to recede back into the darkness from whence they came. Neither are they right now in the US about to become a “silent majority”; not right away, and perhaps not ever.

I’m afraid what happened in Washington last week will happen in Brasília in a couple of years. We must be prepared to react, in Brasil, with the Army (what an irony!). As I’m also afraid that the police may be as lenient in Brasília as it was in Washington DC.

In the United States, they are free from the demented ogre, for the time being. But it is even less likely that more than a few of his “followers” will change their stripes. Their political scene, just like ours in Brasil, is too fractured for that; and American society (just like Brazilian is becoming) is too inegalitarian, too venal and self-seeking, and too much in the thrall of pernicious Evangelical grip to pull itself back up.

Therefore, the task ahead is not to welcome the errant back into the fold, but to contain the damage they do.

That this was coming in the States and is coming in Brasil has been clear for some time, though many chose not to see it… 

Just as it would now be premature to speculate about the extent to which the covid-19 virus will change daily life forever, it is too early to tell how broad and pervasive the harm that Trump & Bolsonaro and their underlings have done to the ambient social and political scene in the United States in Brasil and elsewhere will turn out to be.

There are, after all, no reliable points of reference. How could there be? After all, Trumpism is not much like any of the devils we know — say “Reaganism,” say, or “Clintonism,” or  "Gaullism" or “Lulismo” It is not a comprehensive or partial ideology, though it can include ideological positions when Trump and Bolsonaro believe that they have something to gain by doing so. And although a personality cult has coalesced around Trump and Bolsonaro themselves, Trumpism and Bolsomionismo have little to do with Trump’s or Bolsonaro’s thinking, such as it may be (as far as I know, they are both mad narcissists devoided of empathy and humanistic principles), or with their reptilian and unlovable personalities.

Few, if any, of their followers admire them – what is there to admire? Few of them even like the men; and I believe that they plainly despise them. They may be dense as can be, and Trump and Bolsonaro are anything but subtle, but even so, a few of them must surely realize that. No matter, though; they consider these “leaders” their tribune, and forgive all the rest.

Thus, for bringing Trumpism into the world and causing it to flourish, Trump the man has functioned more as a catalyst than an inspiration. As well as Bolsonaro.

A catalyst for what? It is hard to say because there is no word in English (or, I’d wager, in any language) that directly captures what Trumpism and Bolsominionismo are. The phenomenon is sui generis, in a class by itself. We therefore need a definition longer than a word or two.

I would suggest this: that Trumpism and Bolsonimionismo are a mean-spirited, profoundly toxic political outlook and attitude, born of insecurity and grievance, that echoes readily perceivable aspects of Trump’s and Bolsonaro’s pathetic way of dealing with the world. I would say too that, despite its importance in real world politics, Trumpism and Bolsominionism are ultimately of greater clinical than political interest.

I would also venture that Trumpism mass appeal and therefore its virulence might diminish in the months ahead, just as the covid-19 pandemic will. However, a year from now and perhaps also many years on, there will still be millions of Americans keeping the faith. In Brasil, too, I’m afraid, after Bolsonaro is gone for good in two years time.

Like that damn virus, Trumpism and Bolsominionismo will remain a peril in the U.S. and in Brasil for a long time to come. Alas.

For I believe that the two biggest, richeest and most influential countries of America have another thing in common – the most selfish and uncultured middle and upper classes of the world. Americans and Brazilians alike accumulate university degrees in order to make tons of money and are hungry for social media "information"; however, they lack empathy; and in the process of self-satisfaction, they allow themselves to be lured by sound bites and tend to neglect to acquire knowledge and to be wise.

And without empathy, knowledge and widsom, humanity,civilization itself - in the full sense of the term - can rapidly collapse. Hence, let us beware. We must not lower our guard. Ever. 

PALESTINA

Daily Life under Occupation

As Trump makes his move to stay in power at any cost, the media has been abuzz these days with headlines such as “How Israel Became a World Leader in Vaccinating Against Covid-19.” While the U.S. has vaccinated only 1.67 percent of its population against COVID-19 so far, Israel has already given the vaccine to more than 16 percent of its citizens. In explaining this, the media cites Israel’s highly digitized and “socialized” health care system, along with the fact that the country is small but wealthy (allowing Israel to pay $28 a dose, compared to the $19.50 the U.S. is paying per shot for a Pfizer vaccine). But beyond the headlines celebrating Israel’s vaccination rates, lies a far darker story about health inequality.

Israel has a population of around 9 million. About 20 percent of Israel’s population are Palestinian citizens of Israel. These people can vote in elections, have representation in the Knesset, and are being vaccinated against COVID-19. But, there are another around 5 million Palestinians who live under Israeli rule, without rights, and like the rest of the world, are suffering from the pandemic.

Since 1967, Israel’s settler population has ballooned to more than 500,000, with Israeli settler regional councils controlling 40 percent of West Bank land. Despite the U.S.-facilitated normalization deals with the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Sudan and Morocco that occurred during the latter half of 2020, and were supposed to have halted Israel’s annexing of the West Bank, 2020 has seen the “highest” number of settlement unit approvals since the settlement watchdog group Peace Now began tracking the figures in 2012.

Despite the Palestinian Authority (PA) and Hamas supposedly being the official governments of the West Bank and Gaza, Israel is really in charge. Israel controls the borders, currency, central bank and even collects taxes on behalf of the PA. It maintains the right to carry out military operations on Palestinian land and controls the amount of freedom, or lack thereof, that Palestinians are granted. Even in areas like Ramallah, which are supposedly under the complete control of the PA, Israel reserves the right to enter the city at any time, to close streets and shops, to burst into homes, and to make warrantless military arrests.

Israel’s distribution of the COVID-19 vaccine is far from the country’s only system of inequality. Israeli elections do not include the approximately 5 million Palestinians living in the West Bank and Gaza. While the Palestinians in East Jerusalem can vote in municipal elections, they cannot cast ballots in national elections, such as the one slated to take place in March 2021(the fourth in two years).

Perhaps Israel’s most flagrant demonstration of having two sets of laws for two groups of people is its court system in the West Bank. While Israeli settlers, residing there illegally according to international law, are subject to Israeli civilian law, their Palestinian neighbors live under Israeli military law. This makes them subject to statutes such as Military Order 101, which even bans peaceful protest.

According to the Oslo Accords, signed in 1993, the PA is solely responsible for the health care of Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza. However, those deals were part of the vision that contemplated a more complete peace agreement being signed within five years. Almost three decades later, this larger peace agreement still hasn’t happened and Israel has entrenched its settlement enterprise occupation while flouting international law and dodging its moral, legal, and humanitarian obligations as an occupying power. Providing the COVID-19 vaccine to Palestinians is one of these obligations.

Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza direly need the COVID-19 vaccine. As of January 7, there were 145,252 active cases and 1,536 COVID deaths in the Palestinian territories. The infection and death rates are climbing dangerously. The situation in Gaza is particularly worrisome. Gaza suffers from electricity cuts that last for 12 hours a day. Thanks to Israel’s air, land, and sea siege, as well as multiple military assaults on the crowded enclave, there is a severe shortage of medicine and medical equipment in Gaza along with significant poverty and unemployment. Quarantining and maintaining sanitation in Gaza is extremely difficult.

A World Health Organization-led partnership has set-up the COVID-19 Vaccines Global Access (Covax) Facility, which is aimed at assisting impoverished countries, and “has pledged to vaccinate 20 percent of Palestinians,” according to the Guardian. But Covax vaccines don’t yet have the necessary “‘emergency use’ approval by the WHO,” the Guardian article added. Gerald Rockenschaub, head of the WHO’s office for the occupied Palestinian territory, who was quoted in the Guardian article, said the vaccines that are part of the Covax scheme aren’t likely to be available for distribution in the Palestinian  territories until “early to mid-2021.” According to the Palestinian Health Ministry, the territories have been in a financialcrisis, leaving them next  to no funds to purchase vaccine doses. Even when they were able to find the money, the vaccines they attempted to purchase from Russia could not be procured as Russia informed the PA that they did not have enough doses to sell, according to an article by NPR.

In the first week of 2021, the Palestinian Authority began to inquire if Israel would help them obtain the vaccine. So far, Israeli officials have said that they might offer whatever they have leftover to the West Bank and Gaza after vaccinating Israeli citizens and East Jerusalem Palestinians. If that isn’t medical apartheid, I don’t know what is. 

Daily Life under Occupation

Addameer

OCHA

Palestinian Center for Human Rights

B'Tselem 

International Solidarity Movement – Nonviolence. Justice. Freedom

Defense for Children 
Breaking the Silence

BRASIL

The Intercept Brasil

AOS FATOS: As declarações de Bolsonaro, checadas

domingo, 21 de outubro de 2018

Saoudi Arabia and Israel war crimes are far worse than one murder BrasilHADDADSIM! #ELENÃO




UnB: Ele Não, Não, Não! Em defesa da liberdade de expressão.  
A virada já começou e depende de nós. 
Vá pra rua bater de porta em porta e conversar com as pessoas sobre sua escolha amanhã.
Eu estou fazendo isso mundo afora com todo brasileiro que encontro pelo caminho e por telefone, skype e rede social.  
Ainda tem tempo de virar o voto dos indecisos e dos que pensam em votar no fascista sem pensar nas consequências drásticas do voto anti-petista.

Ainda está indeciso? Vire para a democracia! Assim poderá votar de novo daqui a quatro anos, com certeza, terá liberdade de expressão para reclamar, enfim, desfrutará plenamente de seus direitos de cidadão.  
A fala do Bolsonaro transmitida na avenida Paulista no domingo passado não foi apenas a "manchete do dia". Foi o fato mais grave dessas eleições. O candidato fascista à presidência da nossa República dizer que pretende prender ou exilar opositores é um atentado à democracia. Silenciar agora é omitir-se diante da História. É condenar a nós mesmos, nossos filhos e netos ao obscurantismo.  Vide as batidas nas universidades.
Este indivíduo é o Jair Bolsonaro
DEMOCRACIA SIM!  
Wagner Moura, para você que discorda
Um professor anônimo abre o coração

Brasil de Fato (@Brasil_de_Fato) | Twitter

Caetano Veloso entrevista Roger Waters
Carlos Latuff on RT Going Underground

Saudi Arabia has murdered one journalist and it's rightfully a world outrage. I understand that.

But what about journalists who are attacked every day by Israel, some of them killed, covering the aggressions on occupied Palestinians?

Is Israel above all laws


The plot to murder Jamal Khashoggi, as proved by Turkish audio and video evidence, is a grisly mixture of savagery and stupidity: Jack the Ripper meets Inspector Clouseau. Neither element is surprising because violent overreaction to minor threats is a traditional feature of dictatorial rule. As is the case with Saudi Arabia today.
It is the purpose of such alleged assassinations and kidnappings to not only silence dissident voices however obscure, but to also intimidate all opponents at home and abroad by showing that even a hint of criticism will be suppressed with maximum force. But it is in the nature of dictators that their judgement is unbalanced because they never hear opinions contrary to their own. Iraq invaded Iran in 1980 and Kuwait in 1990 with disastrous results. Saudi Arabia started its war in Yemen in 2015, with similarly catastrophic results, and now appears to think that it can get away with brazenly assassinating Khashoggi as the country firmly denied any involvement in the disappearance and said he left the consulate safely that afternoon, before the Truth emerged.
It is important to watch how long the torrent of criticism of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Saudi Arabia will last. President Trump has been muted in his comments, emphasising the need to keep on terms with the Saudis because of the $110bn contract to sell them arms. Some of those most accustomed to kowtowing to Gulf monarchs and rogue states in general, such Israel, like Tony Blair, are comically reluctant to criticise Saudi Arabia despite the compelling evidence of the murder produced by Turkey. The best Blair did was to say that the issue should be investigated and explained by Saudi Arabia “because otherwise it runs completely contrary to the process of modernisation”. Even for Blair this was surely a new low, and it could also be a dispiriting straw in the wind, suggesting that political elites in the US and UK were not shocked at all.
This is an important point because the murder was by no means the worst act carried out by Saudi Arabia since 2015, though it is much the best publicised. Anybody doubting this should read a report just published which shows that bombing and other military activities by the Saudi-led coalition in Yemen is deliberately targeting food supplies and distribution in a bid to win the war by starving millions of civilians on the other side.
There is nothing collateral or accidental about the attacks according to the report. Civilian food supplies are the intended target with the horrendous results spelled out by the UN at the end of September: some 22.2 million Yemenis or three quarters of the population are in need of assistance, 8.4 million of whom are not getting enough food to eat, a number which may increase by 10 million by the end of the year. “It is bleak,” UN humanitarian chief Mark Lowcock told the Security Council. “We are losing the fight against famine.”
But there are those in Saudi Arabia, UAE and their allies in Washington, London and Paris who evidently do not feel any regret and are intent on creating conditions for a man-made famine as the best way of winning the war against the Houthis who still hold the capital Sana’a and the most highly populated parts of the country. This is the conclusion of the highly detailed report called “The Strategies of the Coalition in the Yemen War: Aerial Bombardment and Food War” written by Professor Martha Mundy for the World Peace Foundation affiliated to the Fletcher School at Tufts University in Massachusetts.
The report concludes that “if one places the damage to the resources of food producers (farmers, herders, and fishers) alongside the targeting of food processing, storage and transport in urban areas and the wider economic war, there is strong evidence that the coalition strategy has aimed to destroy food production and distribution in the areas under the control of Sanaʿaʾ.” It adds that the bombing campaign aimed directly at food supplies appears to have begun in 2016 and is continuing and becoming more effective.
Some aspects of the food war are easy to chronicle: on Yemen’s Red Sea coast no less than 220 fishing boats have been destroyed and the fish catch is down by 50 per cent according to the report. It cites one particular incident on 16 September when 18 fisherman from the district of Al Khawkhah were seized, interrogated and released by a coalition naval vessel which then fired a rocket at “the departing boat carrying the fishermen, killing all but one of them”. The report of this incident has been denied by the coalition.
The Saudi-led coalition began its intervention in the Yemeni civil war in March 2015 on the side of the government of Abdrabbuh Mansur Hadi and against the “Houthi rebels” whom the coalition claims are backed by Iran. As Saudi defence minister at the time, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman was the driving force behind the intervention code named “Decisive Storm”. The coalition air campaign is aided by US aerial refuelling and logistic support while UK military personnel are stationed in command and control centres.
At first, the targets were largely military, but this changed when the coalition failed to win the quick military success its members had expected. Professor Mundy says that “from August 2015 there appears a shift from military and governmental to civilian and economic targets, including water and transport infrastructure, food production and distribution, roads and transport, schools, cultural monuments, clinics and hospitals, and houses, fields and flocks.”
Copiously illustrated with maps and charts, the report shows the impact of bombing and other military activities on the production and availability of food to the civilian population. Lack of electricity to pump water and fuel for farm vehicles have all been exacerbated by the airstrikes. Mundy says that “livestock production has been devastated as families in need sold animals and also found it increasingly difficult to access markets”.
When the farmers do reach a market, their troubles are not over. Coalition air strikes have become more lethal with the beginning of the siege of the Red Sea port of Hodeida by Saudi and Emirati-led forces in June. Some 70 per cent of Yemen’s imports enter the country through Hodeida, which has a population of 600,000. On 2 August the main fish market in the city was attacked along with the entrance to the public hospital where many people were gathered. In July, King Salman of Saudi Arabia issued a general pardon to all Saudi soldiers fighting in Yemen.
The lack of international protests over the war in Yemen, and the involvement of the US and UK as allies of Saudi Arabia and UAE, helps explain one of the mysteries of the Khashoggi disappearance. If the Saudis murdered Khashoggi, why did they expect to carry out the assassination without producing an international uproar? The explanation probably is that Saudi leaders imagined that, having got away with worse atrocities in Yemen, that any outcry over the death of a single man in the Saudi consulate in Istanbul was something they could handle.
The Saudi crown prince and de facto leader of Saudi Arabia, Mohammad bin Salman bin Abduld Aziz al Saud - MBS, as he likes to be affectionately called, has cultivated an international reputation as a progressive reformer, claiming in particular to improve the lot of Saudi women. His March PR visit to the U.S. included a warm and fuzzy interview with Oprah, visits to Harvard and MIT, meetings with Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Michael Bloomberg, Rupert Murdoch, and of course his friend Jared Kushner. His purpose was two-fold: to improve the global image of Saudi Arabia, and to call for common action against Saudi Arabia’s arch-enemy Iran.
What is this 33 man’s record? In March 2011 during the Arab Spring, when the prince was already a senior advisor to his father the king, Saudi Arabia headed an intervention of Gulf states in Bahrain, to quell protests against the absolute monarch. (The great majority of Bahrainis are Shiites, while the king of Bahrain is Sunni. Riyadh views any advancement of Shiite rights and power in the region, both as an expression of heresy—against Sunni Islam—and as an expansion of Iranian Shiite influence.) In June 2017 (after MBS had been made crown prince) Riyadh led an ongoing blockade of Qatar, mainly to punish it for its relatively cordial relations with Iran. That November Riyadh detained the Lebanese prime minister during a visit and forced his resignation (later retracted); this was an effort to punish him for his acceptance of the Hizbollah party in the Lebanese cabinet.
Since 2015 the Saudis have been bombing Yemen in an effort to dislodge the (Shiite) Houthi regime in Sanaa, claiming it’s a tool of Iran. Over 10,000 civilians have been killed and over three million people displaced; the Saudi school bus bombing in August killed 51, mostly children, and attracted brief international horror.
MBS has consolidated his power by the brutal handling of his many rivals within the extravagantly polygamous royal family. (His grandfather Abdullah had at least 35 children by 30 wives.) He is driven by hostility to Iran and all its allies including the Syrian government, Hizbollah in Lebanon, Houthis in Yemen (and perhaps the 15 to 20% of the Saudi population who are Shiites, mostly in the oil-rich Eastern Province that faces Iran across the Persian Gulf). He has warmed up to Israel, berating the Palestinians for not making peace, and cooperating with the Israelis to isolate Iran. Anyone paying attention knows he’s a brutal thug.
Trump has made it clear to the Saudi royals that he doesn’t care about their human rights record. The strict application of Sharia law, which he condemns everywhere else—the stonings for adultery, the gay men tossed off buildings, the crucifixions—is not an issue. All that’s the Saudis’ business, a matter of national sovereignty. And the Pentagon has made it clear that it will back the Saudi military effort in Yemen despite many reports of Saudi atrocities. MBS may feel he can act with impunity in the world and the U.S. president will have his back. He also may have miscalculated.
The Turkish police have concluded that U.S.-based Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi was murdered in the Turkish consulate in Istanbul last week, by a hit squad of 15 Saudis including a forensic doctor flown in to kill him during his consulate visit. (He was apparently there to complete paperwork related to his planned marriage to a Turkish woman.) He was filmed entering the building but never exited as his anxious fiance waited. The police speculate that his body was dismembered and its parts removed by the hit squad that returned to Saudi Arabia on the same day.
Khashoggi, well known as a journalist in Saudi Arabia where he was once close to the royal family, had written mildly critical op-ed columns about it for the Washington Post. These may have offended the famously thin-skinned prince. They may have occasioned a royal court order for the execution of Khashoggi in the consulate, which is technically Saudi sovereign territory.
One must wonder what was going through the head of MBS when he ordered the deed. Did he suppose the truth wouldn’t out? Did he expect Turkish indulgence, and Trump’s acceptance? Did he think the extinction of a moderate critic was worth the risk to his and his country’s reputation? (Perhaps he was recalling the assassination of Kim Jong-un’s brother Kim Jong-nam in Malaysia last year, which had no enduring consequences; Malaysia closed its Pyongyang embassy for awhile but it has now reopened. And Trump is now friends with Jong-un.)
The fact that the Turkish police have a week after Khashoggi’s disappearance announced their assumption of foul play will surely affect Saudi-Turkish relations. The two countries have more or less coordinated their actions in Syria but are at odds on Iran, with which Ankara enjoys cordial relations, and on Qatar which has become a Turkish ally in the wake of the Saudi-led blockade. Turkish public opinion will seethe in indignation at a cold-blooded state-ordered murder in Istanbul.
Now the U.S. press reports that U.S. intelligence had intercepted Saudi officials discussing the kidnapping of Khashoggi. This makes MBS look even worse. You sense he won’t be invited back on Oprah. But he might well be welcomed back in Washington. Trump could proclaim the murder story another “hoax” and say he trusts the prince’s word that there was no collusion. So far he merely said he was unhappy with what happened.
Trump says whatever comes into his mind, whenever he wants. He has mocked the Saudi monarchy as being reliant upon his military support to remain in power. He told a wild pep rally Oct. 2 (the very day Khashoggi was apparently killed): “King: we’re protecting you. You might not be there two weeks without us,. You have to pay for your military.” Rapturous applause!
Similarly, Trump said Christine Blase Ford’s testimony on Kavanaugh was “very credible. “I thought her testimony was very compelling and she looks like a very fine woman to me, very fine woman,” Trump said last week.  “Certainly [Ford] was a very credible witness. She was very good in many respects.” But then he trashed her as a liar. He’s nothing if not mercurial, unpredictable.
Trump flatters himself with having excellent relations with almost all world leaders, from Kim Jong-un (whom he “fell in love with) to Angela Merkel (whom in fact despises him). But he can go from hot to cold at any time. He heaps praise on Xi Jinping and then lobs high tariffs on Chinese goods. He gives Turkey’s Erdogan “high marks” for “doing things the right way” then applies sanctions due to the detainment of a U.S. pastor in Turkey accused of complicity in a coup plot. He could turn on MBS anytime.
The basis of the Saudi-U.S. relationship has been from 1945, when Franklin Delano Roosevelt returning from the Yalta summit visited with Abdul Azziz bin Saud aboard a heavy cruiser in the Suez Canal: cheap oil in return for arms and political support. It was understood at the outset that the U.S. would remain what it was, and that the Saudi kingdom would remain an absolute monarchy guided by religious clerics empowered to administer strict Sharia law.
Decades of U.S. rhetoric about freedom and democracy have always rung hollow as the U.S. has chosen as its key allies not only the NATO and Japanese bourgeois democracies but the dictatorships of Park Chung-hee, Ferdinand Marcos, Suharto, Thai juntas, Pakistani juntas, Latin American juntas, the Greek junta, Francisco Franco, Iran’s Shah, Haile Selassi, Mobutu Sese Seko, Augusto Pinochet, Fulgencio Batista, Papa Doc in Haiti… “The Free World” as taught in U.S. schools comprised the non-communist world. Still, the U.S. government, through the State Department, habitually expresses at least the minimal degree of “concern” about “human rights abuses” here and there. Saudi Arabia is always deplored in the annual assessments, but usually credited with making incremental advances. In any case the U.S. mass media pays little attention, until a school bus is bombed in Yemen, and then the matter’s dropped.
Now however Saudi Arabia is in our face, in the form of news reports on the apparent embassy murder. On Oct. 8, six days after the reported disappearance, Secretary of State Michael Pompeo publicly urged the Saudis to investigate The most haughty and unpleasant Heather Nauert, spokesperson for the State Department, tells journalists that in the interval there was high-level discussion with Saudis but she has nothing to report about it.
So here’s the thing. Trump, who is clueless, will sit down with Pompeo and Bolton. They will say that this looks bad, and the young prince is out of control. He needs to be reminded of what you told the Saudi king the other day: you might not be there two weeks without us. When you kill and dismember a U.S. resident Washington Post journalist with kids that have U.S. nationality you embarrass your friends, the president and his son-in-law, who could be shamed by that politically influential paper for not denouncing the murder of its contributor. You jeopardize your access to U.S. weaponry and refueling services in your ongoing Yemen war. You have to own up to this and apologize.
Somehow I don’t think that will happen. No red line in the sand has been crossed. Trump and the prince certainly chatted on the phone and MBS.Trump can accept that and move on. But given the triangular tension in the region (Turks, Iranians, and Arabs, all intervening in Syria and involved in Iraq) plus the complex relationships of Israel to both Turkey and the Saudis, any U.S. move in response to this incident could produce a new crisis.
Let's hope that those in Congress militating against the Saudi war on Yemen and U.S. involvement in it will seize on this incident to curtail arms sales to the Saudis, and impose sanctions on Saudis considered responsible.
Binyamin Netanyahu is doing everything he can to save his buddy MBS who is helping him against the Palestinians.
Meet Jamal Khashoggi in the Upfront


"Se você acha que uma vitória de Haddad e do PT representa um sério risco à democracia, então sinto informar que você não entendeu nada do que aconteceu na história recente do Brasil. O partido se manteve no poder por 14 anos, tendo sido eleito por quatro vezes. Goste-se ou não dos seus governos, é inegável que ele respeitou a separação de poderes, não ameaçou a liberdade de imprensa e aceitou o resultado de um processo de impeachment que considerava um golpe.

Diante das manifestações de rua que pediam a sua saída, a presidenta afirmou que elas faziam “parte da democracia”. Dilma foi deposta e desceu a rampa do Planalto sem partir para o enfrentamento. Em nenhum momento, ela ou o PT ameaçaram fechar o Congresso ou colocar as Forças Armadas nas ruas para combater oponentes e barrar o processo que consideravam ilegal. Michel Temer assumiu o poder, e o PT foi para a oposição. Jamais se chegou perto das aberrações institucionais e antidemocráticas capitaneadas por Maduro na Venezuela. Apenas as reginas duartes temiam e temem essa possibilidade.
E Bolsonaro? O governo formado por militares aceitaria tranquilamente essas pressões sem recorrer às Forças Armadas? A se levar em conta os discursos proferidos pelo seu líder nos últimos anos, me parece bastante claro que não. Do ponto de vista do risco à democracia, Bolsonaro está muito mais próximo de Maduro do que de Haddad. Não é preciso ser um analista sofisticado para enxergar isso. Os discursos de Bolsonaro durante sua vida pública atestam o seu desprezo pela democracia. O capitão já afirmou textualmente que se fosse presidente daria um auto golpe assim que fosse eleito, fecharia o Congresso no dia seguinte à posse e fuzilaria o então presidente Fernando Henrique Cardoso. Declarou ainda ser a favor da tortura e que só uma guerra civil resolveria os problemas do país. Os discursos de Bolsonaro são a própria “venezuelização” do Brasil.
General Mourão, seu vice, vem fazendo declarações ostensivamente antidemocráticas semana após semana. O seu provável futuro ministro dos Transportes, o general Oswaldo Ferreira, afirmou essa semana: “No meu tempo (ditadura militar), não tinha Ministério Público e Ibama para encher o saco” — este homem é considerado uma das cabeças pensantes da candidatura Bolsonaro nas áreas de infraestrutura e meio ambiente. É isso. Eles acham a democracia um saco.
A campanha bolsonarista passou a eleição inteira questionando a lisura da votação e espalhou deliberadamente mentiras sobre as urnas eletrônicas — as mesmas que elegeram ele e seus filhos por várias vezes seguidas e que levaram o PSL a ter a segunda maior bancada da Câmara neste pleito. O candidato da extrema-direita trabalha abertamente com o golpismo. Ninguém no futuro poderá dizer que foi pego de surpresa, já que a tragédia vem sendo anunciada por eles próprios. Assim como Regina Duarte, quem não está com medo é porque não entendeu." João Filho.

PALESTINA
Dena Trakruri: The Palestinian kids fighting Israel's occupation 
Part I-22'
Part II-21'
#StopTheWar is a hashtag coming from many activists in #Gaza who urge the international community to hinder Israel’s attempts to launch another large-scale aggression against the occupied, blockaded, unlivable, and exhausted Gaza Strip. #GazaUnderAttack.
The people of Gaza have been subjected to decades of expulsion, occupation, siege and massacre. They have now seized control of their Fate. They are risking life and limb as they protest nonviolently to reclaim their basic rights. It takes just one minute to send a video showing your support for Gaza in its moment of truth. Do it now! Send your videos to METOOGAZA.COM.
Renowned scientists urge cientific Community to consider the facts before engaging in activities with Israeli colonial-based Ariel University, and not engage any attemps to use science to normalise Israel(s occupation of the Palestinian territory.