South Africa slams Israel at the United Nations as an apartheid state
"This year, the 14th Israeli Apartheid Week is being commemorated in over 200 cities around the world. Commonly referred to as IAW, as a South African I do not think that a more apt name could have been chosen to highlight the atrocities carried out by the Zionist regime on a daily basis.
Whenever the plight of the Palestinian people is compared with Apartheid, there are more than a few strong objections from the pro-Israel community. The very idea that such a comparison can be made repulses those who support the oppressive system run by the Israeli government, and passionate statements against such remarks are sure to be vented. However, if we analyse the situation from a historic and non-biased view, the similarities between Apartheid South Africa and the situation in Israel are startling and simply cannot be ignored. The restrictive policies applied in the old South Africa are comparable to those presently carried out in occupied Palestine. We know that the government implemented the Group Areas Act here in South Africa, and non-white people were forced to live in specific areas while families were torn apart; all movements were restricted through the use of pass books. A similar policy is seen in Israel, where Jewish settlements are established within and between Palestinian cities and then encircled by concrete walls and barbed wire, completely cutting off Palestinians from other family members and even basic necessities such as access to hospitals. If they need to reach any destination outside of their “homeland”, their papers must be approved by Israeli soldiers, a process which often takes hours, and approval isn’t always given. Countless horror stories have been reported where Palestinians, often children and the elderly, have suffered great deterioration to their health or even death due to these “security” checks.
We can also evaluate the specific repressive policies employed by both governments. The Apartheid government in South Africa worked in a very orderly and structured way. The arrest and detention of political and community leaders was the order of the day and suitable steps were always taken in order to justify the government’s actions. This is precisely how the Israeli government works. It announces that it will “terminate” Hamas leaders or young Palestinians resisting occupation, and truth be told we are then sure to hear of the killing of a leader or ordinary person soon afterwards. Teenagers who are suspected of “terrorist” activities are dragged savagely from their homes in the middle of the night, and must usually endure torture and interrogation without due procedure.
The most notable and current example of this is 17-year-old Ahed Tamimi, who is spending her third month in an Israeli prison for resisting the unjustified storming of her home by Israeli forces. If these young Palestinians are lucky, they will be released — months or even years later — without being charged and tried, but definitely changed for the rest of their lives.
South Africa’s National Party government oversaw a rapid militarisation of society and the army was sent into the non-white townships regularly. Having had the privilege of visiting Palestine myself recently, I can testify to the fact that the entire Israeli society is based around the military. Israeli forces patrol everywhere and, under the illusion of ensuring security, soldiers keep a close and suppressive eye on the Palestinians, monitoring their every move. PW Botha’s government also became famous for its violent suppression of protest marches, and when I witnessed powerful Israeli tanks encroaching on a group of adolescent Palestinians trying to repel them with stones, it is as if o,e was witnessing history repeat itself.
I believe that the similarities are so undeniable, that it seems as if the Israeli government has used, [besides nazi tactics], the Apartheid laws as the basis for its oppressive rule over the Palestinians living under occupation. It is correct to say that the occupation of Palestine by the nascent state of Israel in 1948 was indeed a Nakba, a Catastrophe". DR. Ayesha J Soni.
Norman Finkelstein & Mads Gilbert
PALESTINA
The United States government announced that it is formally established the embassy in Jerusalém on May 14, a day Israel uses as a day of independence. A day that Palestine labels as the "Nakba", or catastrophe. A day of international shame.
Meanwhile, a Palestinian was beaten by multiple Israeli soldiers, and later died in custody. Meanwhile, Palestinians in the Gaza Strip are planning a 45-day tent city protest near the Israel border in the coming weeks to raise their continuing demand that refugees be allowed to return to the Palestinian occupied territory. Hundreds of thousands of families plan to set up tents near the border starting March 30, the annual "Land Day", which commemorates the six Palestinian citizens of Israel who were killed by Israeli forces during démonstrations in 1976 over Israeli land theft. It will en on May 15, the Day of the Nakba, or "catastrophe. When Palestinians mark the displacement and expulsion of thousands in their community with the creation of Israel in 1948. "This national project endorses peaceful resistance as a new way to win our rights, foremost the right of return", says another member of the committee. Palestinians have long been the targets of tear gas, rubber bullets and live ammunition in the West Bank and along the Gaza border. The announcement for the protest has come on the same day that the Israeli parliament passed a law to allow the minister of interior to revoke the residency rights of any Palestinian in Jerusalem, if they engage in a "breach of loyalty" to Israel. Ashrawi, a senior member of the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO), called the law "an extremely racist piece of legislation. By unethically stripping the residency of Palestinians from Jerusalem and depriving the rights of those Palestinians to remain in their own city, the Israeli government is acting in defiance of international law and is violating international human rights and humanitarian law". Other groups have also chimed in to say that the law is illegal under international law.
It's a pity that Argentine agreed to play a "friendly" game against Israel football team. Shame on them!
É pena que a Argentina jogue um amistoso contra o time de Israel em vez de boicotá-lo. Uma vergonha para nós todos. Quanto a Federação argentina estará ganhando para fazer esta propaganda? Que vergonha!
The 14th Annual Israeli Apartheid Week of actions is taking place all around the world. In 2018, it happens between February 19th and April 17th 2018. Israeli Apartheid Week (IAW) is an international series of events that seek to raise awareness of Israel’s apartheid system over the Palestinian people and to build support for the growingBoycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement. A reportreleased earlier this year by the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA) proves beyond doubt that Israel has imposed a system of apartheid on the entire Palestinian people and calls for BDS measures to end Israel’s apartheid regime. Inspired by the popular resistance across historic Palestine and struggles worldwide, IAW 2017 included a wide range of events from lectures, film screenings, cultural performances, and BDS actions, to postering in metro stations, setting up apartheid walls on campuses, and many more. These actions took place in more than 200 cities across the world. The coming year (2018) will mark 70 years of Palestinian popular resistance against the ongoing process of dispossession and ethnic cleansing, since the 1948 Nakba. The Palestinian people’s resistance against colonization has in fact been longer than that. From the Balfour Declaration of 1917 to the present moment- Palestinians have fought for their dignity, their rights, and their lands. IAW is an opportunity to reflect on this resistance and further advance BDS campaigns for the continued growth and impact of the movement. Despite Israel’s legal and propaganda war on BDS internationally, IAW and the BDS movement continue to build linkages and solidarity with other struggles to achieve freedom, justice, and equality. If you would like to organize and be part of Israeli Apartheid Week on your campus or in your city, check out what events are already planned at apartheidweek.org, onFacebook andTwitter, register online http://apartheidweek.org/organise/ and get in touch with IAW coordinators in your region. For more information and support, please contact iawinfo@apartheidweek.org.
Road Map o Apartheid
Who is behing Israeli Apartheid Week?
Israeli Apartheid Week (IAW) was initiated by student activists at the University of Toronto in 2005 and has since spread to cities across the world, including cities in Palestine and South Africa. We are a global network of student, youth, and community organizations working to build Israeli Apartheid Week as part of worldwide actions in solidarity with the Palestinian people. The aim of IAW is to educate people about the nature of Israel as an apartheid system and to build Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) campaigns as part of a growing global BDS movement. We push forward an understanding of Israel an apartheid state. Palestinian citizens of Israel are barred from controlling and developing over 90% of the land, and discriminated against in most aspects of life, particularly in education, health care, public services and employment; simply because they are Palestinians. Palestinians expelled in 1948 and 1967 are denied the right to return to their homes and lands, while the fact that anyone of Jewish background – from anywhere in the world – has the automatic right to become an Israeli citizen and live in Palestine. In the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip, Palestinians live under separate and discriminatory military law, in isolated Bantustans surrounded by the Wall. IAW work to end all international complicity with this apartheid state. Governments provide extensive political and economic support to the Israeli apartheid regime. Corporations profit through investments and joint operations with Israeli companies. Institutions, organizations and unions provide economic and moral backing by maintaining investments in and relations with Israel. Artists, intellectuals and sports teams legitimize Israeli apartheid by continuing business as usual. It is this type of support and cooperation, which allows apartheid to continue to exist, and this is why ending international complicity is so important. We understand Israeli apartheid as one element of a global system ofeconomicand military domination. To this end, we stand in solidarity with all oppressed groups around the world, in particular, indigenous communities suffering under settler colonialism, exploitation and displacement. We are against the racist ideology of Zionism, which is the impetus for Israeli colonialism, because it inherently discriminates against those who are not Jewish. We are against all forms of discrimination, and believe that there can never be justice without the restoration of full rights for everyone, regardless of religion, ethnicity, or nationality. Our demands are based upon the Palestinian Civil Society Call for Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions against Israel, issued on 9 July 2005 by over 170 Palestinian organizations, which states thatBoycott, divestment and sanctions should be imposed and maintained until Israel meets its obligation to recognize the Palestinian people’s inalienable right to self-determination and fully complies with the precepts of international law by: 1. Ending its occupation and colonization of all Arab lands, dismantling the Wall and freeing all Palestinian and Arab political prisoners; 2. Recognizing the fundamental rights of the Arab-Palestinian citizens of Israel to full equality; 3. Respecting, protecting and promoting the rights of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes and properties as stipulated in UN General Assembly resolution 194. To be part of the Israeli Apartheid Week International Network, organizations should commit to the basis of unity above, coordination with the international network, c) building, as part of Israeli Apartheid Week activities, local BDS awareness and campaigns.
Road Map to Apartheid
subtitulado en español
Ideas for action
Israeli Apartheid Week is organised by an international network of grassroots solidarity groups, unions and activists. We can support you to organise IAW events on your campus or in your city. Register now using the form on this page to receive an info pack full of ideas and inspiration and to be able to promote your events on this website. Get in touch via iawinfo@apartheidweek.org if you have any questions. 1. Show a film Showing a film can be a great way to engage new audiences and help people understand the realities of Israeli apartheid. Organise a discussion after the film to allow people to further develop their understanding and share their thoughts. Register and receive our organising pack for more info. 2. Hear from inspiring speakers There are many speakers ranging from academics, politicians, trade unionists and cultural activists that we can suggest for you to host. Be in touch with us via iawinfo@apartheidweek.org and we can put you in contact. 3. Organise a creative protest action Organise a creative protest action to highlight the complicity of a company or put pressure on a university or other institution to meet the demands of your campaign. Use creative visuals to help communicate your message and make sure to share photos and videos on social media using the #IsraeliApartheidWeek hashtag. 4. Build links with other movements Joint events and initiatives with other movements that explore how different forms of oppression and linked and how we face common opponents can help us to build links with other movements and strengthen our commitment to a world free from oppression. 5. Hear from an organisation in Palestine via Skype/telephone Organising an event where an activist in Palestine speaks via Skype or telephone can be a great way to connect with ongoing events and struggles in Palestine. Download our pack for more info. 6. Host a cultural event or concert If it’s part of Israel’s colonial project to erase Palestinian culture, then let’s make it part of our organising to showcase and celebrate Palestinian art and music. Organising a cultural event or concert can be a great way to celebrate Palestinian culture, build connections between people and strengthen our movement, and to draw in people who wouldn’t normally be interested in a panel event or workshop type event. 7. Get people together for a workshop Organise a workshop about Israeli Apartheid, the BDS movement or your current campaign. Hear from an expert, share skills and experiences, or plan the next steps of your campaign. Be in touch with us via iawinfo@apartheidweek.org and we can suggest workshop facilitators in your area and help you plan your workshop. 8. Spread the word!#IsraeliApartheidWeek Help us spread the word online about Israeli Apartheid Week. Follow Israeli Apartheid Week on Twitter and Facebook, including using the hashtag #IsraeliApartheidWeek and share photos and reports from events you organise or attend.
Road Map to Apartheid Questions and Answers
PALESTINA
The United States government announced that it is formally established the embassy in Jerusalém on May 14, a day Israel uses as a day of independence. A day that Palestine labels as the "Nakba", or catastrophe. A day of international shame.
Meanwhile, one more Palestinian was beaten by multiple Israeli soldiers, and later died in custody.
Internacionalmente, para quem não conhece o país e seus habitantes, o alegórico se sobrepõe ao real porque não há como lutar contra a máquina midiático-poltício-econômica ocidental.
Conforme a propaganda fomentada pela grande mídia subserviente ao lobby sionista e aos Estados Unidos, o Irã é um inimigo de amigos da paz e do progresso. A hasbara (propaganda em hebraico) é tão repetida e eficiente, que o país foi transformado em um pária global (Rússia e Putin, idem).
O engodo é que o Irã viola tratados e normas em busca psicótica de munir-se de bombas atômicas que avassalem os "coitados" dos israelenses armados ate os dentes de armas químicas e nucleares; primeiro; depois, o mundo inteiro.
Nos Estados Unidos e em Israel existe um consenso profundo e inflexível sobre a "monstruosidade" do Irã. E a propaganda espalha-se pelo mundo ocidental, ignorante do país em questão.
O papel dos EUA nessa impostura é hercúleo: peitar o bully persa "em defesa da democracia e da paz global".
Portanto, quando Barack Obama quis abrir o mercado iraniano às corporações estadunidenses e decidiu sentar à mesa de negociações com Teerã sobre o nuclear para as sanções econômicas que estrangulam o país e empobrecem a população, pareceu um avanço. Obama foi elogiado, um acordo foi assinado, apesar dos iranianos desconfiarem dos gringos por jamais terem cumprido a palavra. Tinham razão. No fim, Teerã manteve seu lado da barganha, reduzindo o estoque nuclear existente e o enriquecimento de urânio a um nível inferior ao necessário à fabricação de armas, enchendo as centrífugas de concreto, enviando material de "dupla utilização" para a Rússia e permitindo a inspeção da AIEA nas datas marcadas.
Nesse ínterim, os EUA suspenderam o bloqueio em parte. Com uma chantagem monetária que favorizasse os negócios com as multinacionais estadunidenses e dificultasse contratos com empresas europeias e as nossas. E a condição de vida dos iranianos continuou difícil.
Até aí, da parte dos EUA, havia pelo menos um semblante de respeito ao acordo, e uma concórdia de fachada.
Porém, o compadre de Binyamin Netanyahu, Donald Trump, está determinado a destruir "the worst deal ever". O simples fato de começar a esbravejar contra o Irã e ameaçar o retorno total das sanções já está espantando investidores estrangeiros, de cujo dinheiro o Irã precisa para reergue-se de décadas de bloqueio gringo. Respeitado cegamente pelos países ocidentais que temem a cólera do império e sobretudo das multas vertiginosas, devidas à ditadura do dólar.
O pior é que os líderes europeus, americanos, asiáticos, e as pessoas em geral, que podiam fazer algo, calam-se. Encolhem-se diante do bully e de sua hasbara.
Pois o órgão de imprensa oficial sionista New York Times e outros controlados pelo mesmo lobby nos Estados Unidos , na Europa, e inclusive no nosso país, distorcem o debate público. Tiram o Irã do rol de nação-estado legítimo com o qual se lida por vias diplomáticas e sim como um monstro selvagem que tem de ser domado, vencido e enjaulado.
É nessa distorção normativa que reside a injustiça. Que não é própria a Trump. Obama, em sua má-fé, ou ignorância, durante as negociações, retratou o acordo como uma oportunidade para o Irã jungar-se à comunidade internacional e enfatizou que novas restriç 5es impediriam o Irã de armar-se. Esse enquadramento semântico, em si, -vinda de um presidente negro, democrata, que se dava ares de intelectual de mente aberta - reforçou no inconsciente coletivo a imagem falsa e absurda de o Irã ser um estado desonesto como Israel, e de ter planos clandestinos para construir armas nucleares e quantos danos causar.
A lógica da quimera é histórica. Data de 1953, quando a CIA deu um golpe em Teerã tirando Mohammed Mossadegh da presidência para a qual fora eleito democraticamente.
Por que os EUA interviram em um país soberano para instalar um ditador, Mohammad Reza Pahlevi, no trono?
Porque Mossadegh estava nacionalizando a indústria petroleira e o que era bom para os iranianos era ruim para os carteis ocidentais de petróleo.
O mito do lobo mal nasceu quando em 1979, forças revolucionárias derrubaram a ditadura do Xá, e o aiatolá Ruhollah Khomeini purgou as forças progressistas de esquerda, excluiu os Estados Unidos do país e instalou a República Islâmica do Irã.
Desde então, os Estados Unidos punem sistematicamente a recalcitrância do Irã de ajoelhar-se diante da Casa Branca e de rejeitar sua ditadura econômica.
Sua primeira tentativa de subjugar Teerã foi patrocinando uma guerra devastadora servindo-se de Saddam Hussein como testa de ferro e do Iraque como boi de piranha. Pôs um arsenal milionário nas mãos de Bagdá e o uso de armas químicas deixou uma cicatriz indelével na população iraniana.
De lá para cá, Tel Aviv, Washington e Ryad cercaram militarmente o Irã por todos os lados, financiando grupos terroristas disfarçados de "rebeldes" para desestabilizar os poucos aliados iranianos no Oriente Médio.
A confiança de Teerã em Washington, que já era frágil, se fragmenta dia a dia com as intervenções militares dos EUA e de Israel nos países vizinhos. Concomitantemente, a Casa Branca e Tel Aviv fecham o cerco e põem em perigo o único país estável da região. Paradoxalmente, o único em que, há uma convivência pacífica entre judeus, cristãos e muçulmanos. O único que não cultiva terroristas e que é livre do extremismo do Daesh e do al-Qaeda, em cujo combate errado e desorganizado os EUA provocou o caos na Líbia, Síria e Iraque.
Tomara que apareça um líder lúcido que contradiga a hasbara que os aiatolás têm de ser derrubados para o bem dos iranianos. Não é verdade. A população não quer a queda dos aiatolás. Quer estabilidade econômica.
E os líderes iranianos, Hassan Rouhani na cabeça, querem diálogo e paz.
Why should mainstream media and American politicians salivate over instability and the prospect of regime change in Iranian? It’s not Washington's business to dictate the future of Iran or be a dimwit cheerleader from the sidelines. Besides, actual American interests would run antithetical to an Iranian regime ouster, were we not wagged by the Israeli-Saudi tail.
But, of course, from a humanitarian perspective, the protests in Iran are more complicated.
When Trump and Binyamin Netanyahu voice support for Iranian protesters, patent hypocrisy rules the roost. Trump has encouraged violence against U.S. protesters during his campaign rallies and denounced black football players for kneeling during the national anthem. Netanyahu has had Palestinian activists’ Facebook accounts deleted and oversees the IDF’s policy of detaining, injuring and occasionally killing protesters in occupied Palestine. Their rhetoric towards Iran’s protests not merely makes explicit their (and the Saudi) long-held desire of seeing the Iranian regime fail. It may also suggest a possible behind-the-scenes CIA action, similar to the 1953 coup that overthrew Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh.
American politicians and media should remember that protests happen everywhere. Usually, they don’t cheer them on or have masturbatory hopes for state failure – only in cases of purported enemy states, like Russia, Venezuela and Iran. When Palestinians protest, implicit in U.S. media and politicians’ attitudes is that they deserve to be brutalized by the IDF, allegedly for the sake of Israel’s security. As Kenyans protested and violence killed thousands of people in 2007, U.S. media and politicians here were insouciant. When Black Lives Matter protested in U.S. cities, armored vehicles greeted them, followed by undercover agent infiltration. But when Iran has demonstrations that last for over a week, the U.S. government and media adorn vulture masks and salivate. They care not about “democracy” in Iran but serve American misconceived interests dictated by the Israeli-Saudi tail.
But, one may think: isn’t there good reason for regime change, as Iranians live under tyranny and their government is a chief sponsor of terrorism?
First, let’s deconstruct the patently false myth that Iran is a sponsor of terrorism.
Iran assisted the U.S. at the beginning of the 2001 Afghan invasion, because the Salafi/Wahhabi-influenced Taliban and Al Qaeda view Iran as an enemy – an ‘apostate’ Shia state. Secondly, Iran has assisted the U.S. in fighting ISIS in Iraq and Syria; ISIS is another radical, Wahhabi-influenced group that regard Shia as the worst kind of apostate, an enemy from within.
Thirdly, yes, Iran supports both political parties Hizbollah and Hamas; less of the latter, due to differences over the Syrian Civil War. Hizbollah remains an armed political group within Lebanon that acts as a check on Israeli aggression, and played a key role in ending of the decades-long Israeli occupation of southern Lebanon. Additionally, this ‘terrorist’ group has fought ISIS and al-Nusra (al-Qaeda) in Syria. Furthermore, in 2015, Hizbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah condemned the Charlie Hebdo attacks; if Hizbollah was an ‘Islamic terrorist’ group, Nasrallah’s denunciation would be odd, indeed…Imagine an actual Islamic terrorist group like Boko Haram condemning the Hebdo attacks: it’s not going to happen. Hizbollah is not a terrorist organization, but simply opposes perceived U.S. interests in the Middle East.
Hamas, though less close with Iran in recent years, has every right to fight Israel’s illegal occupation of Palestine, under Geneva Protocol 1, Articles 43 and 44. While Hamas’s suicide bombings of Israeli civilians during the Second Intifada can be accurately described as terrorism acts copied from Zionists brigades behaviour until 1948, Israeli Defense Forces’ attacks on Palestinian civilians have far eclipsed any Hamas-induced civilian violence against Israelis. Since 2005, Hamas has ended suicide bombing tactics en 2005, while the IDF continues to mow down Palestinians in exorbitant numbers until now.
Therefore, Iran’s support of these armed political groups does qualify it as a terror sponsor, but rather a supporter of the oppressed underdog. This derives, in part, from the Shias’ devotion to Husayn ibn Ali. Husayn died after facing extreme privation at the 680 Battle of Karbala; he fought for what Shias believe was just cause against the tyrannical Umayyad Caliph Yazid I’s army.
But, isn’t Iran a despotism?
No. There really is no evidence to suggest that Iranians are not, by and large, supportive of the country’s theocratic-republican system, which mixes the theocratic rule of an ayatollah with a democratic parliamentary system. Iranians desire reform and improved economic conditions, but not a change to the Shia republic’s system of governance.
There is an Iranian ambivalence toward the U.S. While Iranians generally hold a favorable attitude towards the American people, they are averse to the U.S. government’s “Haq-khordan-trampling of rights” of Iranians. This includes subverting Iranian politics throughout history and trying to prevent Iran from developing nuclear energy.
Is Iran a perfect liberal democracy – far from it. But isn’t that the case for innumerable nations, including France (where the right to boycott Israel was taken from its Citizen) and the United Stares that control every step of its citizens, communications and the media? Besides blackmailing the world with the dollar dictatorship.
However, in context, Iran remains significantly more democratic than most countries in the Middle East.
So, let’s quit cheerleading for an overthrow of Iran’s government, and allow Iranians to sort out their own grievances.